Abstract
This study compared vertical scaling results for the Rasch model from BILOG-MG and WINSTEPS. The item and ability parameters for the simulated vocabulary tests were scaled across 11 grades; kindergarten through 10th. Data were based on real data and were simulated under normal and skewed distribution assumptions. WINSTEPS and BILOG-MG were each executed with default and tightened convergence settings. The results were compared in terms of differences and correlations between estimated item and ability parameters. Under default convergence settings, BILOG-MG appeared to capture the individual and mean estimates more accurately. However, once convergence settings were tightened, the programs generated similar results and reproduced the simulated parameter estimates more accurately than when default convergence settings were used.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 133-149 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Applied Measurement in Education |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Developmental and Educational Psychology