Utility of the Geological Carbon Sequestration (GCS) business: Potential perils and scenarios till 2150 and beyond

Ruud Weijermars*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study highlights long-term greenhouse gas emission-curbing scenarios, pushing the time-frame from 2050 to 2150 and beyond (2200). The model is based on a new scenario-modelling approach, combining history-matching of past emission data (1850-2022) with forward-modelling algorithms (2023-2200). Considered are the effect of curbing measures reducing anthropogenic annual growth by n x ζ (n=number of years since the starting curb measure; ζ=curbing rate, with 0.0025, 0.005, 0.0075, 0.01, 0.025, and 0.05 per year). The global inequity in efforts to mitigate emissions is highlighted. The numerous Geological Carbon Sequestration (GCS)-projects currently executed in the North Sea, targeting depleted offshore gas fields (Porthos, Aramis, Orion), a depleted oil field (Greensand), and saline aquifers (Endurance, Northern Lights, Acorn) are vulnerable to volatility in the European carbon-credit market (ETS). If the ETS market fails, price-guarantees for GCS-projects by governments mean tax-payers will bear the brunt.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-65
Number of pages9
JournalFirst Break
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 EAGE Publishing BV. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Utility of the Geological Carbon Sequestration (GCS) business: Potential perils and scenarios till 2150 and beyond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this