Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas

  • Laetitia B. Mulder*
  • , Eric van Dijk
  • , David De Cremer
  • , Henk A.M. Wilke
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

223 Scopus citations

Abstract

Sanctioning systems in social dilemmas are often meant to increase trust in others and to increase cooperation. We argue, however, that sanctioning systems may also give people the idea that others act in their own self-interest and undermine the belief that others are internally motivated to cooperate. We developed the "Removing The Sanction" paradigm and a new trust manipulation, and showed in three experiments that when there is a sanction on defection, trust in others being internally motivated to cooperate is undermined: Participants who had experienced the presence of a sanctioning system trusted fellow group members less than participants who had not. In a similar vein, the sanction undermined cooperation when trust was initially high. The implications of these paradoxical findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-162
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cooperation
  • Sanctions
  • Social dilemmas
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this