The impact of limited search procedures for systematic literature reviews - A participant-observer case study

Barbara Kitchenham*, Pearl Brereton, Mark Turner, Mahmood Niazi, Stephen Linkman, Rialette Pretorius, David Budgen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study aims to compare the use of targeted manual searches with broad automated searches, and to assess the importance of grey literature and breadth of search on the outcomes of SLRs. We used a participant-observer multi-case embedded case study. Our two cases were a tertiary study of systematic literature reviews published between January 2004 and June 2007 based on a manual search of selected journals and conferences and a replication of that study based on a broad automated search. Broad searches find more papers than restricted searches, but the papers may be of poor quality. Researchers undertaking SLRs may be justified in using targeted manual searches if they intend to omit low quality papers; if publication bias is not an issue; or if they are assessing research trends in research methodologies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2009
Pages336-345
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

Name2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Software

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of limited search procedures for systematic literature reviews - A participant-observer case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this