Steam reforming of simulated pre-reformed naphtha in a PdAu membrane reactor

Firas S. Alrashed*, Stephen N. Paglieri, Zainab S. Alismail, Hassan Khalaf, Aadesh Harale, Johan P. Overbeek, Henk M. van Veen, Abbas S. Hakeem

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Process intensification in a membrane reactor is an efficient and compact way to produce hydrogen. A methane-rich gas mixture that simulated the composition of pre-reformed naphtha (PRN; with a steam-to-carbon ratio of 2.7) was reformed at temperatures of 550 °C–625 °C and pressures up to 40 barg. The reactor contained commercial steam reforming catalyst and a 14.8 cm long, 2.6 μm thick Pd-1.8Au (wt. %) membrane on a porous alumina support. Methane conversions approaching 90% were obtained in the membrane reactor at a gas-hourly space velocity of 676 h−1, compared to ≤30% conversion at the same conditions in conventional reactor mode (CM) without withdrawing hydrogen through the membrane. The results were compared to steam methane reforming (SMR) in the membrane reactor at similar conditions. The nitrogen leak through the membrane increased slowly during the testing, because of both pinhole formation and some leakage through the end seals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21939-21952
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume46
Issue number42
DOIs
StatePublished - 18 Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC

Keywords

  • High pressure membrane reforming
  • Hydrogen production
  • Membrane annealing
  • Membrane reforming
  • PdAu membrane
  • Steam reforming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Fuel Technology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Steam reforming of simulated pre-reformed naphtha in a PdAu membrane reactor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this