TY - JOUR
T1 - Scanning tunneling microscopy and surface simulation of zinc-blende GaN(001) intrinsic 4× reconstruction
T2 - Linear gallium tetramers?
AU - Al-Brithen, Hamad A.H.
AU - Yang, Rong
AU - Haider, Muhammad B.
AU - Constantin, Costel
AU - Lu, Erdong
AU - Smith, Arthur R.
AU - Sandler, Nancy
AU - Ordejón, Pablo
PY - 2005/9/30
Y1 - 2005/9/30
N2 - Scanning tunneling microscopy images confirm electron difraction studies that the zinc-blende GaN(001)-4× reconstruction consists of rows aligned along [110] with a spacing along [11̄0] of 4a. Dual-bias imaging shows a 180° shift of the corrugation maximum position between the profiles of empty and occupied states, in agreement with surface simulations based on the 4×1 linear tetramer model of Neugebauer et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3097 (1998)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3097]. Electronic structure calculations predict a surface band gap of 1.1 eV, close to the measured value of 1.14 eV and the previously predicted value (1.2 eV). Despite the successes of this model, high-resolution images reveal an unexpected 3× periodicity (not seen in diffraction) along the [110] row direction, indicating the need for a 4×3 model, and putting into question the existence of linear Ga tetramers.
AB - Scanning tunneling microscopy images confirm electron difraction studies that the zinc-blende GaN(001)-4× reconstruction consists of rows aligned along [110] with a spacing along [11̄0] of 4a. Dual-bias imaging shows a 180° shift of the corrugation maximum position between the profiles of empty and occupied states, in agreement with surface simulations based on the 4×1 linear tetramer model of Neugebauer et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3097 (1998)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3097]. Electronic structure calculations predict a surface band gap of 1.1 eV, close to the measured value of 1.14 eV and the previously predicted value (1.2 eV). Despite the successes of this model, high-resolution images reveal an unexpected 3× periodicity (not seen in diffraction) along the [110] row direction, indicating the need for a 4×3 model, and putting into question the existence of linear Ga tetramers.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/28844444641
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.146102
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.146102
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:28844444641
SN - 0031-9007
VL - 95
JO - Physical Review Letters
JF - Physical Review Letters
IS - 14
M1 - 146102
ER -