Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Retaliation as a Response to Procedural Unfairness: A Self-Regulatory Approach

  • Lieven Brebels*
  • , David De Cremer
  • , Constantine Sedikides
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

74 Scopus citations

Abstract

When does procedural unfairness result in retaliation, and why do recipients of unfair treatment sometimes pursue and other times inhibit retaliation? Five studies addressed these questions. The authors proposed and found that regulatory focus moderates retaliation against an unfairness-enacting authority: Promotion-focus participants were more likely to retaliate than prevention-focus participants. Promotion focus was associated with, and also heightened the accessibility of, the individual self. In turn, individual-self accessibility influenced retaliation. In fact, prevention-focus participants were as retaliatory as promotion-focus participants under conditions of high individual-self accessibility. Implications for the procedural fairness and regulatory focus literatures are discussed, and suggestions for future research are offered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1511-1525
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume95
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • procedural fairness
  • regulatory focus
  • retaliation
  • self-activation
  • unfair treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retaliation as a Response to Procedural Unfairness: A Self-Regulatory Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this