Reasoning maps for decision aid: An integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation

G. Montibeller*, V. Belton, F. Ackermann, L. Ensslin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper proposes a tool for multi-criteria decision aid to be referred to as a Reasoning Map. It is motivated by a desire to provide an integrated approach to problem structuring and evaluation, and in particular, to make the transition between these two processes a natural and seamless progression. The approach has two phases. In the first one, the building of a Reasoning Map supports problem structuring, capturing a decision maker's reasoning as a network of means and ends concepts. In the second phase, this map is enhanced, employing a user-defined qualitative scale to measure both performances of decision options and strengths of influence for each means-end link. This latter phase supports the decision maker in evaluating the positive and negative impacts of an action through synthesis of the qualitative information. A case study, which investigates the use of the method in practice, is also presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-589
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
Volume59
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 13 May 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cognitive mapping
  • Multiple criteria evaluation
  • Qualitative decision analysis
  • Soft-hard OR integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reasoning maps for decision aid: An integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this