Quantification and comparison of carbon emissions for flexible underground pipelines

Lutfor Rahman Khan, Kong Fah Tee*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

The life cycle assessment of underground gravity and pressured pipeline networks are studied to quantitatively calculate the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The life cycle of a pipeline can be classified into four phases that are fabrication, transportation, installation, and operation. Three typical flexible underground pipe materials, namely, steel, ductile iron (DI), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) have been considered. The most dominant phase of the life cycle is pipe manufacturing and fabrication process, resulting in large amounts of CO2 emissions. The results indicate that PVC provides the best environmental savings compared to steel and DI pipes in terms of CO2 emission and emission mitigation cost. This methodology in estimating life cycle carbon footprint and cost could be used as managerial decision support tool for management of any underground pipeline networks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)728-736
Number of pages9
JournalCanadian journal of civil engineering
Volume42
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Aug 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©, 2015, National Research Council of Canada. All Rights Reserved.

Keywords

  • Buried pipelines
  • Carbon footprint
  • Carbon pricing
  • Embodied carbon
  • Energy consumption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • General Environmental Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantification and comparison of carbon emissions for flexible underground pipelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this