Abstract
Previous studies show that profitability does not improve after share issue privatization (SIP) in China. We explore the possibility that the positive privatization effect can be overwhelmed by a negative listing effect, leading to an overall negative or insignificant SIP profitability change. Using the difference-in-differences approach with various matched samples, we show that there is a positive privatization effect and there is a negative listing effect on profitability. We also document evidence of a significant improvement in profitability after separating the “pure” privatization effect from the SIP effect. Our findings are robust to alternative variable specifications and methodological changes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 369-394 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Pacific Basin Finance Journal |
| Volume | 56 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019
Keywords
- Difference-in-differences
- Government policy and regulation
- Listing
- Privatization
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics