Privatization effect versus listing effect: Evidence from China

  • Bo Li
  • , William L. Megginson
  • , Zhe Shen*
  • , Qian Sun
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous studies show that profitability does not improve after share issue privatization (SIP) in China. We explore the possibility that the positive privatization effect can be overwhelmed by a negative listing effect, leading to an overall negative or insignificant SIP profitability change. Using the difference-in-differences approach with various matched samples, we show that there is a positive privatization effect and there is a negative listing effect on profitability. We also document evidence of a significant improvement in profitability after separating the “pure” privatization effect from the SIP effect. Our findings are robust to alternative variable specifications and methodological changes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-394
Number of pages26
JournalPacific Basin Finance Journal
Volume56
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019

Keywords

  • Difference-in-differences
  • Government policy and regulation
  • Listing
  • Privatization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Privatization effect versus listing effect: Evidence from China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this