Abstract
In this study, accurate and convenient prediction models of tubular solar still performance, expressed as hourly production, were developed by utilizing machine learning. Based on experimental data, the models were developed and compared, such as classical artificial neural network with/without Baysian optimization, random forest with/without Baysian optimization, and traditional multilinear regression. Before applying Bayesian optimization, both random forest and artificial neural network predict hourly production. But the superiority of random forest is well behaved with insignificant error. The prediction performance of random forest, artificial neural network and multilinear regression were calculated as 0.9758, 0.9614, 0.9267 for determination coefficients, and 5.21%, 7.697%, 10.911% for mean absolute percentage error, respectively. Additionally, when applying Bayesian optimization for searching most appropriate hyper parameters, the performance of artificial neural network was significantly improved by 35%. Moreover, optimization findings revealed that random forest was less sensitive to hyper parameters than artificial neural network. Based on the robustness performance and high accuracy, the random forest is recommended in predicting production of tubular solar still.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 116233 |
| Journal | Applied Thermal Engineering |
| Volume | 184 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 5 Feb 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
- Artificial neural network
- Bayesian optimization
- Machine learning
- Random forest
- Regression model
- Tubular solar still
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology
- Mechanical Engineering
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering