Pipeline leak localization using matched-field processing incorporating prior information of modeling error

  • Xun Wang*
  • , Muhammad Waqar
  • , Hao Chen Yan
  • , Moez Louati
  • , Mohamed S. Ghidaoui
  • , Pedro J. Lee
  • , Silvia Meniconi
  • , Bruno Brunone
  • , Bryan Karney
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

To date, the use of matched-field processing (MFP) for leak detection in pipes has been limited to cases where the mismatch between data and model is assumed to be random and Gaussian distributed. This paper extends the MFP to the more realistic case where the mismatch involves both random and modeling errors. Experimental results show that the modeling error for cases with and without a leak remains similar in shape and magnitude. As a result, modeling errors can potentially be estimated from a baseline signal which ideally can be obtained before major defects emerge. This attribute is exploited to formulate a novel MFP technique that uses both past baseline and current signals to detect leaks. The novel MFP remains optimal in the sense of achieving maximum signal-to-noise ratio. The gain of the proposed leak detection method is assessed via three experimental scenarios in which the modeling errors range from simple to complex.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106849
JournalMechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Volume143
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Leakage localization
  • Matched-field processing
  • Transient waves
  • Uncertainty identification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Signal Processing
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pipeline leak localization using matched-field processing incorporating prior information of modeling error'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this