Physical properties of sediment from the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope

  • William Winters*
  • , Michael Walker
  • , Robert Hunter
  • , Timothy Collett
  • , Ray Boswell
  • , Kelly Rose
  • , William Waite
  • , Marta Torres
  • , Shirish Patil
  • , Abhijit Dandekar
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

115 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study characterizes cored and logged sedimentary strata from the February 2007 BP Exploration Alaska, Department of Energy, U.S. Geological Survey (BPXA-DOE-USGS) Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well on the Alaska North Slope (ANS). The physical-properties program analyzed core samples recovered from the well, and in conjunction with downhole geophysical logs, produced an extensive dataset including grain size, water content, porosity, grain density, bulk density, permeability, X-ray diffraction (XRD) mineralogy, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and petrography.This study documents the physical property interrelationships in the well and demonstrates their correlation with the occurrence of gas hydrate. Gas hydrate (GH) occurs in three unconsolidated, coarse silt to fine sand intervals within the Paleocene and Eocene beds of the Sagavanirktok Formation: Unit D-GH (614.4. m-627.9. m); unit C-GH1 (649.8. m-660.8. m); and unit C-GH2 (663.2. m-666.3. m). These intervals are overlain by fine to coarse silt intervals with greater clay content. A deeper interval (unit B) is similar lithologically to the gas-hydrate-bearing strata; however, it is water-saturated and contains no hydrate.In this system it appears that high sediment permeability (k) is critical to the formation of concentrated hydrate deposits. Intervals D-GH and C-GH1 have average "plug" intrinsic permeability to nitrogen values of 1700 mD and 675 mD, respectively. These values are in strong contrast with those of the overlying, gas-hydrate-free sediments, which have k values of 5.7. mD and 49 mD, respectively, and thus would have provided effective seals to trap free gas. The relation between permeability and porosity critically influences the occurrence of GH. For example, an average increase of 4% in porosity increases permeability by an order of magnitude, but the presence of a second fluid (e.g., methane from dissociating gas hydrate) in the reservoir reduces permeability by more than an order of magnitude.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-380
Number of pages20
JournalMarine and Petroleum Geology
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Melanie Holland, Peter Schultheiss, and Walter Barnhardt provided helpful reviews of the manuscript. Aditya Deshpande, University of Alaska at Fairbanks, assisted with minipermeameter measurements. BP was the designated operator for fieldwork. The drillers and staff at the well site are thanked for obtaining cores, performing logging runs, and providing logistical support under adverse conditions. This work was supported by the Coastal and Marine Geology, and Energy Programs of the U.S. Geological Survey and funding was provided by the Gas Hydrate Program of the U.S. Department of Energy.

Keywords

  • Gas hydrate
  • Grain size
  • Milne Point
  • Mineralogy
  • Permeability
  • Physical properties
  • Porosity
  • Sagavanirktok Formation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Geophysics
  • Geology
  • Economic Geology
  • Stratigraphy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physical properties of sediment from the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this