Abstract
An important policy issue facing countries is the effectiveness of nominal currency devaluation in boosting exports and improving the trade balance of the devaluing country. It is argued that nominal devaluation would be effective only if it leads to real devaluation. This paper examines the relationship between nominal and real effective exchange rates for 17 European transition economies to determine whether nominal devaluation leads to real devaluation. Employing the ARDL cointegration test with quarterly data over the period 1994-2013, the results show that while nominal devaluation leads to real devaluation in the short run in all but Estonia, this short-run effect lasts into the long run in only Armenia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Georgia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and the Czech Republic. Further analysis on sub-samples corresponding to different exchange rate regimes (pre and post ERM II) suggests that different exchange rate regimes may have different impacts on the link between nominal and real devaluations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 677-698 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Eastern Economic Journal |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Sep 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 EEA.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- ARDL model
- devaluation
- effective exchange rate
- transition economies
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the Nominal and Real Currency Devaluation Nexus in European Transition Economies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver