On a conjecture about spectral sets

Karim Belaid, Othman Echi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Let R be a commutative ring with identity. We denote by Spec(R) the set of prime ideals of R. Call a partial ordered set spectral if it is order isomorphic to (Spec(R),⊆) for some R. A longstanding open question about spectral sets (since 1976), is that of Lewis and Ohm [Canad. J. Math. 28 (1976) 820, Question 3.4]: "If (X,≤) is an ordered disjoint union of the posets (Xλ,≤λ), λ∈Λ, and if (X,≤) is spectral, then are the (Xλ,≤λ) also spectral?".Let (X,≤) be a poset and x∈X. Recall that the D-component of x is defined to be the intersection of all subsets of X containing x that are closed under specialization and generization (i.e., under ≤ and ≥). Let (X,≤) be a spectral set which is an ordered disjoint union of the posets (Xλ, ≤λ), λ∈Λ. It is clear that (Xλ,≤λ) is a disjoint union of D-components of X. Thus the conjecture of Lewis and Ohm is equivalent to the following question: "Is a D-component of a spectral set spectral?"This paper deals with topological properties of a D-component of a spectral set, improving the understanding of the conjecture of Lewis and Ohm. The concepts of up-spectral topology and down-spectral topology are introduced and studied.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalTopology and its Applications
Volume139
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 28 Apr 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ordered disjoint union
  • Spectral set
  • Spectral topology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geometry and Topology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On a conjecture about spectral sets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this