Abstract
Let k be a field and X an indeterminate over k. In this note we prove that the domain k[[Xp;Xq]] (resp. k[Xp;Xq]) where p; q are relatively prime positive integers is always divisorial but k[[Xp;Xq;Xr]] (resp. k[Xp;Xq;Xr]) where p; q; r are positive integers is not. We also prove that k[[Xq;Xq+1;Xq+2]] (resp. k[Xq;Xq+1;Xq+2]) is divisorial if and only if q is even. These are very special cases of well-known results on semigroup rings, but our proofs are mainly concerned with the computation of the dual (equivalently the inverse) of the maximal ideal of the ring.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 38-42 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Turkish Journal of Mathematics |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© TÜBITAK.
Keywords
- Divisorial domain
- Divisorial ideal
- Noetherian domain
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Note on the divisoriality of domains of the form k[[Xp;Xq]], k[Xp;Xq], k[[Xp;Xq;Xr]], and k[Xp;Xq;Xr]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver