NEWS AND INFORMATION RIGIDITY: FURTHER EVIDENCE FROM GDP GROWTH FORECASTS

Fazlul Miah*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The study investigates the existence and the extent of information rigidity in gross domestic product (GDP) growth forecasts among 25 developed and 18 developing economies during 2002-2017 period utilizing a survey dataset never explored before on this issue. In general, the study finds ample evidence of information rigidity. However, it is not as common and as severe as it is in earlier studies. Our study also finds ample evidence of overreaction to new information. Information rigidity is present during the recession period for the developed countries, and we find some evidence of information gathering picking up during the recession period. Overall, we notice less forecast rigidity or inefficiency in our study compared to some earlier studies. Our multi-country test results show that forecast revisions depend on both own country and cross-country lagged revisions. In general, forecast revisions of developed economies, especially USA, prompt revisions in other developed and developing economies. Similarly, some developing countries' forecast revisions prompt revisions in other developed and developing countries although at smaller magnitudes. Therefore, we confirm from earlier studies that one source of forecast rigidity is not to incorporate overseas events in forecast revisions quickly and completely.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2450003
JournalGlobal Economy Journal
Volume23
Issue number1-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 World Scientific Publishing Company.

Keywords

  • GDP forecasts
  • Information rigidity
  • cross-country forecasts
  • forecast efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'NEWS AND INFORMATION RIGIDITY: FURTHER EVIDENCE FROM GDP GROWTH FORECASTS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this