Abstract
The primary objective of numerous optimization problems is to enhance a single metric whose lowest or highest value accurately reflects the response quality of a system. However, in some instances, relying solely on one metric is not practical, leading to the consideration of multi-objective (MO) optimization problems that aim to improve multiple performance indicators simultaneously. This approach requires the use of a multi-objective optimization method adept at handling the intricacies of scenarios with various indices. Consequently, researchers have not explored multi-objective truss optimization as extensively as single-objective (SO) scenarios. The novel multi-objective Lichtenberg algorithm with two archives (MOLA-2arc) has been developed to address this. The efficacy of MOLA-2arc is evaluated against eight other MO algorithms, including the multi-objective bat algorithm (MOBA), multi-objective crystal structure algorithm (MOCRY), multi-objective cuckoo search (MOCS), multi-objective firefly algorithm (MOFA), multi-objective flower pollination algorithm (MOFPA), multi-objective harmony search (MOHS), multi-objective jellyfish search (MOJS) algorithm, and the original multi-objective Lichtenberg algorithm (MOLA). The challenge is to minimize structural mass and compliance while adhering to stress limitations. The outcomes demonstrate that MOLA-2arc shows notable improvements over its predecessor, MOLA, and surpasses all other competing algorithms in this study.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 297-312 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Materialpruefung/Materials Testing |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Feb 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
Keywords
- engineering design
- global optimization
- metaheuristics
- multi-objective
- truss optimization
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Materials Science
- Mechanics of Materials
- Mechanical Engineering