Mode choice behavior of high school goers: Evaluating logistic regression and MLP neural networks

Khaled J. Assi*, Kh Md Nahiduzzaman, Nedal T. Ratrout, Adel S. Aldosary

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is a quite a handful of scientific evidence where logistic regression and multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLPs) are compared to explain mode choice behavior. Student populations, however, are understudied. Further, a model that better explains the mode choice behavior of ‘high school’ goers has not been scientifically investigated. On this backdrop, this paper endeavored to make a comparison between the efficiency and robustness of the logistic regression model and MLPs to predict and explain the mode choice behavior of high school students in Khobar city. Among the pertinent variables considered, the logistic regression model finds that (i) monthly family income, (ii) travel time to school, and (iii) parents’ education level are statistically significant to determine the mode choice to the school. Based on the most significant variables and a comparative analysis conducted between logistic regression and MLP, the latter has better strength in predicting and explaining mode choice behavior of public high school goers. This led to a reflection on the implications for transport policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-230
Number of pages6
JournalCase Studies on Transport Policy
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 World Conference on Transport Research Society

Keywords

  • High school students
  • Logistic regression
  • Mode choice
  • Neural network

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Transportation
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mode choice behavior of high school goers: Evaluating logistic regression and MLP neural networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this