Mitigating the negative effect of intrabrand clustering: the role of interbrand clustering and firm size

  • Moeen Naseer Butt*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clustering—geographic concentrations of entities—has recently received more attention in marketing research and has been shown to affect multiple outcomes. This study investigates the impact of intrabrand clustering (clustering of same-brand outlets) on an outlet’s quality performance. Further, it assesses the moderating effects of interbrand clustering (clustering of other-brand outlets) and firm size. An examination of approximately 21,000 food service establishments in New York State in 2019 finds that the impact of intrabrand clustering on an outlet’s quality performance is context-dependent. Specifically, intrabrand clustering decreases, whereas interbrand clustering and firm size help to increase the outlet’s performance. Additionally, this study finds that the role of firm size is more substantial than interbrand clustering in mitigating the adverse effects of intrabrand clustering on outlet quality performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-48
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Brand Management
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Keywords

  • Brand competition
  • Firm size
  • Interbrand clustering
  • Intrabrand clustering
  • Outlet performance
  • Quality violations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mitigating the negative effect of intrabrand clustering: the role of interbrand clustering and firm size'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this