Abstract
Background: The rapid adoption of low-code (LC) and no-code (NC) tools has transformed the software development landscape, offering faster development cycles and enabling non-programmers to contribute to software creation. Objective: This study systematically maps the effects of LC/NC tools on developers, addressing the critical need to understand whether these tools serve as a valuable aid or a potential threat to their roles. Methods: By analyzing how LC/NC tools support development processes, the challenges they present, and their potential to replace traditional developers, this research fills a key knowledge gap by performing a systematic mapping study. Results: The findings reveal that while LC/NC tools simplify certain tasks, they do not replace the need for professional developers to handle complex technical challenges, change management, and system integration. Conclusions: Rather than posing a threat, these tools complement and enhance developers' expertise, empowering them to focus on more advanced aspects of software creation. This study provides valuable insights for the professional developer community and the broader software industry, advocating for the thoughtful integration of LC/NC tools as powerful aids rather than competitors to professional development.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 802-819 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Software - Practice and Experience |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s). Software: Practice and Experience published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords
- low-code/no-code tools
- professional developers
- systematic mapping study
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Software
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Low-Code and No-Code Tools: A Valuable Aid or a Potential Threat to Professional Developers?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver