Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Life cycle assessment of electric scooters for mobility services: A green mobility solutions

  • Muhammad Ishaq*
  • , Haris Ishaq*
  • , Afzaal Nawaz
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

The gradual rise in global warming owing to fossil fuels usage is causing massive environmental problems and global temperature rise and countries are focusing on the negative emissions technologies (NETs) to restrict the average global temperature rise to 1.5°C by 2050. As Italy instigates its stable recovery from the coronavirus emergency, the Italian government is offering Italian people financial support of up to €500 to buy a personal bicycle or e-scooter, to reduce dependence on private cars and global warming issues and people inItaly have greeted this opportunity for new personal e-scooters. This paper aims to employ a life cycle assessment (LCA) onthe personally owned electric scooters (PEOS) that are circulating in Turin. The results are reported for five impact categories: global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone layer depletion, and human toxicity potential. We found that the environmental load associated with the usage and charging of e-scooters is less compared with the materials and manufacturing burdens of e-scooters. Regarding the GWP, the results of Analysis methodology of the use of the PEOS generate 21 g of CO2-eq. per passenger-kilometer dominated by around 50% from materials processing, 17.5% from Li-ion battery production, 1.6% from transportation, and 30.9% from usage and charging of e-scooter. Four scenarios are compared with the base case situation, which are the substitution of alternate materials, use of 50% recycled aluminum, transportation of e-scooters via plan, and charging with solar power. Results from these scenarios are proved to be highly sensitive to baseline scenarios. Results also revealed that PEOS has higher (21 g CO2 eq./km) environmental consequences on the global warming potential as compared to bicycles (8 g CO2 eq./km) and lower (21 g CO2 eq./km) environmental impacts as compared with electric bicycles (40 g CO2 eq./km) and battery electric vehicles (80 g CO2 eq./km).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20339-20356
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Energy Research
Volume46
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  4. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  5. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • electric scooters
  • environmental impacts
  • global warming potential
  • green mobility solutions
  • life cycle assessment
  • transportation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Life cycle assessment of electric scooters for mobility services: A green mobility solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this