Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Leader endorsement in social dilemmas: Comparing the instrumental and relational perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the role of leadership in overcoming social dilemmas within groups. First, based on prior theorising and research we present two alternative perspectives on leader endorsement in social dilemmas, an instrumental and a relational perspective. Next, we systematically compare these perspectives in a series of experiments investigating leadership in social dilemmas created within small groups in the laboratory. The results of our studies suggest that when their personal identity is salient, group members more strongly endorse leaders who are perceived to be instrumental in solving the freerider problem. In contrast, when a social identity is salient, members more strongly endorse leaders who fulfil their relational needs. Based on these findings we propose a differential needs model of leader endorsement in social dilemmas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-184
Number of pages30
JournalEuropean Review of Social Psychology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2003
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2003, Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • Cooperation
  • Differential Needs Model
  • Freeriding
  • Group-value Model
  • Instrumental And Relational Needs
  • Leader Endorsement
  • Leadership
  • Public Goods
  • Social Dilemmas
  • Social Identity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leader endorsement in social dilemmas: Comparing the instrumental and relational perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this