Knowledge management and balanced scorecard outcomes: Exploring the importance of interpretation, learning and internationality

Tracy L. Gonzalez-Padron*, Brian R. Chabowski, G. Tomas M. Hult, David J. Ketchen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

The topics of shared interpretation, organizational learning and firm internationalization have been studied extensively. Though considered important factors that shape the international competitive landscape, research synthesizing these interrelated areas has been limited to date. We use the balanced scorecard as a framework for assessing how organizational learning and sensemaking influence actions relating to a global marketing strategy and subsequent financial performance. Using data from 169 multinational corporations, findings indicate that a specific set of knowledge activities is related to balanced scorecard outcomes (e.g. customer performance, innovation and learning performance, and internal process performance). The hypothesized importance of customer performance is confirmed as the only balanced scorecard outcome significantly related to financial performance. A post hoc analysis revealed further insights for future research opportunities. Overall, these results suggest that firms can improve their competitive position by emphasizing shared interpretation within the organization and including balanced scorecard elements when assessing performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)967-982
Number of pages16
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Business, Management and Accounting
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge management and balanced scorecard outcomes: Exploring the importance of interpretation, learning and internationality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this