Interference analysis in wireless power transfer

Yunfei Chen; Daniel B. Da Costa; Haiyang Ding

doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2017.2725259

Interference analysis in wireless power transfer

Yunfei Chen^*, Daniel B. Da Costa, Haiyang Ding

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

This letter studies the effect of co-channel interference (CCI) generated by wireless power transfer on information delivery for three widely used setups, i.e., power beacon (PB), hybrid access point (HAP), and simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT). It focuses on the comparison of CCI from these three schemes in terms of the average interference power, the ergodic capacity, and the bit error rate. Numerical results show that the extra interference caused by wireless power transfer indeed degrades the system performance. Moreover, SWIPT has the largest degradation, while PB and HAP have the same degradation when proper parameters are chosen.

Original language	English
Article number	7973174
Pages (from-to)	2318-2321
Number of pages	4
Journal	IEEE Communications Letters
Volume	21
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2017.2725259
State	Published - Oct 2017
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 1997-2012 IEEE.

Keywords

Bit error rate
co-channel interference
ergodic capacity
wireless power transfer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Modeling and Simulation
Computer Science Applications
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1109/LCOMM.2017.2725259

Cite this

@article{6e0e0fd01b8a46779f1f0bfb5459d2be,

title = "Interference analysis in wireless power transfer",

abstract = "This letter studies the effect of co-channel interference (CCI) generated by wireless power transfer on information delivery for three widely used setups, i.e., power beacon (PB), hybrid access point (HAP), and simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT). It focuses on the comparison of CCI from these three schemes in terms of the average interference power, the ergodic capacity, and the bit error rate. Numerical results show that the extra interference caused by wireless power transfer indeed degrades the system performance. Moreover, SWIPT has the largest degradation, while PB and HAP have the same degradation when proper parameters are chosen.",

keywords = "Bit error rate, co-channel interference, ergodic capacity, wireless power transfer",

author = "Yunfei Chen and \{Da Costa\}, \{Daniel B.\} and Haiyang Ding",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 1997-2012 IEEE.",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1109/LCOMM.2017.2725259",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "2318--2321",

journal = "IEEE Communications Letters",

issn = "1089-7798",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interference analysis in wireless power transfer

AU - Chen, Yunfei

AU - Da Costa, Daniel B.

AU - Ding, Haiyang

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - This letter studies the effect of co-channel interference (CCI) generated by wireless power transfer on information delivery for three widely used setups, i.e., power beacon (PB), hybrid access point (HAP), and simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT). It focuses on the comparison of CCI from these three schemes in terms of the average interference power, the ergodic capacity, and the bit error rate. Numerical results show that the extra interference caused by wireless power transfer indeed degrades the system performance. Moreover, SWIPT has the largest degradation, while PB and HAP have the same degradation when proper parameters are chosen.

AB - This letter studies the effect of co-channel interference (CCI) generated by wireless power transfer on information delivery for three widely used setups, i.e., power beacon (PB), hybrid access point (HAP), and simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT). It focuses on the comparison of CCI from these three schemes in terms of the average interference power, the ergodic capacity, and the bit error rate. Numerical results show that the extra interference caused by wireless power transfer indeed degrades the system performance. Moreover, SWIPT has the largest degradation, while PB and HAP have the same degradation when proper parameters are chosen.

KW - Bit error rate

KW - co-channel interference

KW - ergodic capacity

KW - wireless power transfer

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85023609655

U2 - 10.1109/LCOMM.2017.2725259

DO - 10.1109/LCOMM.2017.2725259

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85023609655

SN - 1089-7798

VL - 21

SP - 2318

EP - 2321

JO - IEEE Communications Letters

JF - IEEE Communications Letters

IS - 10

M1 - 7973174

ER -

Interference analysis in wireless power transfer

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this