Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Green Bond Pricing: A Comprehensive Review of the Empirical Literature

  • Lewis Liu*
  • , Yanqi Hu
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

As green finance grows, green bonds have become an essential tool for funding sustainable projects. While many studies explore whether green bonds exhibit a “green premium,” existing literature reviews often lack depth, timeliness, and consistent methodology. This paper addresses these gaps by systematically reviewing 70 empirical studies on green premiums published up to 2025, making it the most comprehensive review to date. We organize the literature by region (Global, U.S., Europe, Asia Pacific), market segment, premium dimension, data source, and estimation method, offering a structured framework to analyze diverse findings. Our analysis reveals a consistent negative green premium of −12.44 bps on average across most markets, with European and Asian markets showing higher yield spreads than the U.S. Studies using more recent data report smaller premiums, and larger bond issues tend to have lower premiums. Despite variations in methods and data sources, the overall results are consistent. This paper provides an updated overview of green premium research and offers key insights for investors, issuers, and policymakers on green finance pricing and investment strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number689
JournalJournal of Risk and Financial Management
Volume18
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.

Keywords

  • bond spread
  • green bonds
  • pricing
  • sustainable finance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Green Bond Pricing: A Comprehensive Review of the Empirical Literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this