Forums for electronic government scholars: Insights from a 2012/2013 study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Once an academic study domain has accumulated a certain volume of domain-specific knowledge, a number of outlets emerge as preferred outlets for publication. Electronic government research (EGR) is no exception. After developing for some 15. years from its early beginnings in the late 1990s, this multi-disciplinary academic domain appears to have reached exactly this point. With an active researcher community numbering in the hundreds worldwide and a body of over 5500 peer-reviewed manuscripts and books in the English language alone, EGR has grown past its infancy into a discernible and reputable academic endeavor in its own right. While the Electronic Government Reference Library (EGRL) provides a comprehensive account of the peer-reviewed EGR literature, the preferences of publication outlets had not been studied. This study closes this gap, and it provides clues for assessing the reputation and quality of scholarly work in EGR, which is highly relevant for decisions in tenure and promotion cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-242
Number of pages14
JournalGovernment Information Quarterly
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Conference and journal ranking
  • EGOV
  • EGR
  • Electronic Government Reference Library (EGRL)
  • Electronic government
  • Outlet reputation
  • Tenure and promotion criteria

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forums for electronic government scholars: Insights from a 2012/2013 study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this