Abstract
The emergence of generative AI technologies has led to an increasing number of people collaborating with AI to produce creative works. Across two experimental studies, in which we carefully designed and programmed state-of-the-art human–AI interfaces, we examine how the design of generative AI systems influences human creativity (poetry writing). First, we find that people were most creative when writing a poem on their own, compared to first receiving a poem generated by an AI system and using sophisticated tools to edit it (Study 1). Following this, we demonstrate that this creativity deficit dissipates when people co-create with—not edit—AI and establish creative self-efficacy as an important mechanism in this process (Study 2). Thus, our findings indicate that people must occupy the role of a co-creator, not an editor, to reap the benefits of generative AI in the production of creative works.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 18525 |
| Journal | Scientific Reports |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords
- Artificial intelligence
- Co-creation
- Creativity
- Self-efficacy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver