TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing polymeric nano-composite ceramic membrane performance and sustainable recovery for palm oil mill effluent (POME) wastewater treatment using advanced chemometric algorithms
AU - Usman, Jamilu
AU - Raji, Yusuf Olabode
AU - Abba, Sani I.
AU - Usman, A. G.
AU - Yogarathinam, Lukka Thuyavan
AU - Abdu, Fahad Jibrin
AU - Dzarfan Othman, Mohd Hafiz
AU - Aljundi, Isam H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - This study investigates the enhancement of emulsified oily wastewater treatment using high-performance poly (diallyldimethylammonium chloride) PDADMAC ultrafiltration membranes through a multi-model machine learning (ML) approach. The study was based on experimental scenarios and more emphasis on computational learning applications. In this context, kernel Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Linear Regression (LR), Stepwise Regression (SWR), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) were employed to predict water flux (WF) and oil rejection (OR). Subsequently, traditional Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was developed for predictive comparison. The predictive skills were evaluated and visualized using statistical indicators and 2-dimensional diagrams. GPR achieved the highest predictive accuracy for OR, with an NSE of 99.32 %, zero bias (PBIAS 0.0000), and the lowest MAE (0.0010). For WF, the RSM-W) model outperformed others with an NSE of 82.03 %, the lowest MAE (0.0051), and a slight underestimation bias (PBIAS −0.0587). These models significantly outperformed RLR, SWR, and MLR, which showed moderate accuracy and higher prediction errors. The environmental implications align with the goals of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Enhanced treatment processes contribute to cleaner water bodies, protect marine ecosystems, and promote sustainable industrial practices. Future research should focus on field trials to validate these models under real-world conditions, integration with real-time monitoring systems for dynamic adjustments, and life cycle assessments to evaluate long-term sustainability.
AB - This study investigates the enhancement of emulsified oily wastewater treatment using high-performance poly (diallyldimethylammonium chloride) PDADMAC ultrafiltration membranes through a multi-model machine learning (ML) approach. The study was based on experimental scenarios and more emphasis on computational learning applications. In this context, kernel Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Linear Regression (LR), Stepwise Regression (SWR), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) were employed to predict water flux (WF) and oil rejection (OR). Subsequently, traditional Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was developed for predictive comparison. The predictive skills were evaluated and visualized using statistical indicators and 2-dimensional diagrams. GPR achieved the highest predictive accuracy for OR, with an NSE of 99.32 %, zero bias (PBIAS 0.0000), and the lowest MAE (0.0010). For WF, the RSM-W) model outperformed others with an NSE of 82.03 %, the lowest MAE (0.0051), and a slight underestimation bias (PBIAS −0.0587). These models significantly outperformed RLR, SWR, and MLR, which showed moderate accuracy and higher prediction errors. The environmental implications align with the goals of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Enhanced treatment processes contribute to cleaner water bodies, protect marine ecosystems, and promote sustainable industrial practices. Future research should focus on field trials to validate these models under real-world conditions, integration with real-time monitoring systems for dynamic adjustments, and life cycle assessments to evaluate long-term sustainability.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Machine learning
KW - Oil rejection
KW - PDADMAC ultrafiltration membranes
KW - Palm oil mill effluent
KW - Water flux
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216365405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.procbio.2025.01.022
DO - 10.1016/j.procbio.2025.01.022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216365405
SN - 1359-5113
VL - 150
SP - 306
EP - 317
JO - Process Biochemistry
JF - Process Biochemistry
ER -