e-Waste transboundary movement regulations in various jurisdictions

  • Pablo Dias*
  • , Md Tasbirul Islam
  • , Bin Lu
  • , Nazmul Huda
  • , Andréa M. Bernarde
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The growing volumes of electrical and electronic waste (e-waste), alongside their potential to be valuable resource or harmful pollutants, have made this waste stream an important subject of research, legislation, and policymaking. E-waste management comprises a series of activities, some of which are profitable and some of which are not. The current regulations in place exist in an attempt to ensure the unprofitable (but necessary) activities are undertaken in a sound manner (safe to humans and to the environment) and to state whom the stakeholder responsible for such activities are. The responsibility and financial liability may fall under the manufacturer (polluter-pay principle), the government, the consumer, or a combination of different stakeholders, and this varies widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. There are currently a set of international, national, and regional legislations/treaties that oversee the movement and management of e-waste. The most notorious international treaty is the Basel Convention, which is 30 years old, ineffective and contains known loopholes that allow disguised e-waste export as equipment for repair. In the national and regional scope, legislation concerning e-waste can vary widely, even within a single country-like in the case of China, Canada, and the USA. The lack of unity in legislation, or at least a set of regulations design to be collaborative with each other, is one of the current challenges worldwide. The use of conformity verification systems (e.g. WEEELABEX), a standardized universal extended producer responsibility policy or a significant update on the (outdated) international treaties, may be a solution, but it seems that the world is far from reaching these milestones. Finally, China's recent ban has affected the global WEEE market, which, in turn, has affected the regulatory framework of other Southeast Asian nations. More changes are expected in the near future due to the cascading effect of these changes and further import bans already announced by China.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationElectronic Waste
Subtitle of host publicationRecycling and Reprocessing for a Sustainable Future
PublisherWiley-VCH Verlag
Pages33-59
Number of pages27
ISBN (Electronic)9783527816408
ISBN (Print)9783527344901
DOIs
StatePublished - 26 Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 WILEY-VCH GmbH.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • E-waste regulation
  • E-waste world
  • Electronic waste legislation
  • Recycling
  • Transboundary WEEE
  • Waste management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemistry
  • General Chemical Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'e-Waste transboundary movement regulations in various jurisdictions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this