Abstract
According to the social learning literature, agents faced with asymmetries rationally ignore their own information to follow the herd. We argue that investors in listed SMEs that are known for their high informational opacity exhibit more herding compared to investors in large firms in order to lower the impact of informational asymmetries. Given a gap in the listed SMEs’ literature, we test our hypothesis offering first time evidence on their herding behavior. The results support our hypothesis. Herding is more prevalent among listed SMEs (known as micro-caps in the US) during normal periods, while during crisis periods, all micro-cap investors are faced with the same informational problem and do not herd because they expect that none of them has information of better quality. In addition, we reveal cross-market herding effects and a positive link of liquidity and herding. The results have implications for portfolio management and regulatory authorities among others.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1619-1637 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Small Business Economics |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Keywords
- Asymmetry
- Cross-country effects
- Herding
- Large capitalizations
- Liquidity
- SMEs
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Business, Management and Accounting
- Economics and Econometrics