Abstract
The kinetic energy that is released upon bond rupture is often represented as T1/2. A value that is derived from the FWHM of a fragment peak by the use of two different conversion formulas. The choice of formula depends on whether the peak is recorded by scanning a magnetic sector or an electrostatic analyzer. We have conducted a systematic variation of the possible scan configurations of two different double focusing instruments in two countries. We have found that a double focusing mass spectrometer in normal geometry gives rise to T1/2 values that are 1.4 times larger when analyzing peaks that are obtained from magnet scans compared to the peaks that are obtained by scanning an electrostatic analyzer. The E scans (MIKE experiments) give rise to the same values for both of the employed mass spectrometers. The results are explained in terms of energy defocusing when the reactions take place too far away from the focal points and show that only the E scans T1/2 values can be compared from instrument to instrument.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 14-17 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | International Journal of Mass Spectrometry |
| Volume | 429 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
Keywords
- Kinetic energy release
- Sector mass spectrometry
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Instrumentation
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Spectroscopy
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Determination of kinetic energy release from metastable peak widths: An investigation of the instrument-dependence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver