Culture and Multiple Firm–Bank Relationships: A Matter of Secrecy and Trust?

  • Fotios Pasiouras
  • , Elie Bouri
  • , David Roubaud
  • , Emilios Galariotis*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examines the impact of trust and a national culture of secretiveness on the number of bank relationships per firm. We hypothesize that the degree of openness of a firm and trust between economic agents may influence the willingness of the firm to release sensitive information to its lenders, as well as the decision between maintaining single or multiple bank relationships. Using a sample of over 8000 non-financial firms operating in 12 countries from the eurozone we provide evidence that a national culture of secrecy enhances the number of bank relationships, while trust has the opposite effect. Results are robust to the use of various estimation techniques, alternative definitions of secrecy and trust, controls for firm-level and country-level characteristics, and instrumental variables. The main implication of this finding is that the financial decisions of firms cannot be effectively examined without considering deep-rooted national cultural elements. We also find that the results are mainly driven by small and medium enterprises, implying that the higher informational opaqueness of these firms enhances the role of secrecy and trust.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-249
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume174
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature B.V.

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Firm–bank relationship
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • General Business, Management and Accounting
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Culture and Multiple Firm–Bank Relationships: A Matter of Secrecy and Trust?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this