Abstract
The authors regret that in the originally published Fig. 2, data presented for X–ray Diffraction (XRD) and Fourier–Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses were processed using smoothening and baseline correction techniques via OriginPro software. While such processing aimed to enhance visualization, it inadvertently introduced deviations from raw data, which may lead to potential confusion or misinterpretation. To ensure clarity and maintain integrity of scientific communication, we hereby provide revised version of Fig. 2, where both Fig. 2a-b present original (raw) unprocessed XRD and FTIR data, respectively.[Figure presented] Upon careful review, it was noted that Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrograph labelled as 20% Dy–doped ZnSm2O4 sample was mistakenly replaced with SEM image of undoped ZnSm2O4 sample. The authors sincerely regret this oversight. The corrected Fig. 3 now contains an accurate SEM micrograph corresponding to the 20% Dy-doped ZnSm2O4 sample, along with all other samples, having their intended SEM micrographs, properly depicting intended morphology. Importantly, these corrections pertain solely to visual representations and do not affect the scientific results, analysis, or discussion presented in manuscript. Overall conclusions of article remain valid and unchanged.[Figure presented] The authors would like to sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused and will ensure greater attention in the future.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39349-39350 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Ceramics International |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 23 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Sep 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Ceramics and Composites
- Process Chemistry and Technology
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films
- Materials Chemistry