Corrigendum to “Critical analysis of the limitations and validity of the assumptions with the analytical methods commonly used to determine the photovoltaic cell parameters” [Renew Sustain Energy Rev 140 (2021) 110753](S1364032121000484)(10.1016/j.rser.2021.110753)

Correction 1: The authors regret for the errors in the assumptions of the method (F) (reference [95]). The assumption was wrongly taken. Therefore, all the results and conclusion made on the basis of the assumption (F2) should be ignored in the main manuscript. Now, the assumption “(F2)” should be corrected in Table 1, as, [Formula presented] Additionally, the assumption (F4) was omitted, which should be included in Table 1, as, [Formula presented] The assumptions (F2) and (F4) of reference [95] are same as the assumptions (G4) and (G5) of reference [96], respectively. Therefore, the discussions and explanations related to the assumptions (F2) and (F4) will be similar to that of the discussions and explanations of (G4) and (G5), respectively. The corrected conclusions regarding the method (F) are given below: The method (F) [95] is valid for Si PV cell for P_in < 5 suns, well valid for multi-junction PV cell, and valid with error for the stressed PV module. The corrected version of Table 5 is given below: Table 5. Validity of assumptions of all the analytical methods [52,83,92–96]. [Table presented] The corrected version of Table 6 is given below: Table 6. Validity of the analytical methods [52,83,92–96] based on their assumptions. [Table presented] The corrected Fig. 21 is given by [Figure presented] Fig. 21. Classification of the analytical methods (assumption's series) based on the validity of their assumptions. Correction 2: There are few typos in Table 2. There should be ‘+’ sign between first and second terms in the numerator of eq (11). Therefore, in Table 2, the eq (11) should be corrected to [Formula presented] There should be ‘+’ sign between first and second terms of eq (14). So, in Table 2, the eq (14) should be corrected to [Formula presented] There should be ‘+’ sign between first and second terms in the numerator of eq (36). So, in Table 2, the eq (36) should be corrected to [Formula presented] Correction 3: The title of the reference [95] should be corrected to ‘On the analytical approach for modeling photovoltaic systems behavior’. The page no. of reference [45] should be corrected to ‘304–15.’. The authors apologise for the above errors and any consequent inconvenience to cited authors and readers.