Corrigendum to “Bandgap energy prediction of senary zincblende III-V semiconductor compounds using machine learning” [Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 161 (2023) 107461] (Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing (2023) 161, (S1369800123001543), (10.1016/j.mssp.2023.107461))

The authors regret a typo error in the original paper. The error appeared in the Results and Discussion section on Page 4 for the molar fraction formula for “AlGaInP”. The formula written is Al_xGa_(1-x)In_0.5P while the correct formula should be (Al_xGa_(1-x))_0.5In_0.5P. The error occurred in. - Fig. 4b. (the text form in the figure), [Figure presented] - The corresponding caption of Fig. 4b.: “(b) Al_xGa_(1-x)In_0.5P, the experimental data are shown in the green circles”,- The third paragraph on Page 4 “To ensure the robustness and transferability of the two complementary ML models, they were tested against experimental results of quaternary compounds; namely Al_xGa_yIn_1−x−yAs [29,30], Al_xGa_(1-x)In_0.5P [31,32], In(P_0.69Sb_0.31)_1−yAs_y [33] and Ga_xIn_1−xP_yAs_1−y [34–36].”,- The fourth paragraph on Page 4: “The agreement is much better for all the other three cases. Fig. 4(b) shows the experimental values of [Formula presented] for Al_xGa_(1-x)In_0.5P [31,32]”The corrected format (Al_xGa_(1-x))_0.5In_0.5P to replace the errors mentioned. - Fig. 4b. (Attached as pdf),[Figure presented] - The corresponding caption of Fig. 4b.: “(b) (Al_xGa_(1-x))_0.5In_0.5P the experimental data are shown in the green circles”,- The third paragraph on Page 4: “To ensure the robustness and transferability of the two complementary ML models, they were tested against experimental results of quaternary compounds; namely Al_xGa_yIn_1−x−yAs [29,30], (Al_xGa_(1-x))_0.5In_0.5P [31,32], In(P_0.69Sb_0.31)_1−yAs_y [33] and Ga_xIn_1−xP_yAs_1−y [34–36].”,- The fourth paragraph on Page 4: “The agreement is much better for all the other three cases. Fig. 4(b) shows the experimental values of [Formula presented] for (Al_xGa_(1-x))_0.5In_0.5P [31,32]”The error does not affect the related results or the conclusion of the study. The results and simulations, and Fig. 4b correspond to the correct form, (Al_xGa_(1-x))_0.5In_0.5P, which satisfies the charge neutrality condition imposed in the calculations. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Also, the work is reflected on on-line application on https://cmd-ml.github.io/iiiv-zb-eg.github.io/.