Correction to: Ambient Nanoparticles (PM0.1) Mapping in Thailand (Atmosphere, (2022), 14, 1, (66), 10.3390/atmos14010066)

There were errors in the original article [1]. It was incorrect to state that particulate matter should be abbreviated PM. All abbreviations in the main text should be PM_0.1, PM_2.5, and PM_10. A correction has been made to the Abstract: PMs_0.1 should be PM_0.1. A correction has been made to the Introduction: PMs_0.1 should be PM_0.1, and PMs_2.5 should be PM_2.5. In the original article, there were some mistakes in Table 2 as published. The corrected Table 2 appears below. A correction has been made to Table 2: reference [52] should be March–April 2016. In Section 2.4. PM_0.1 Derived from Biomass Burning. A correction has been made to “Phairuang et al. (2021) [32], reported on the source apportionment of PM_0.1 particles in Bangkok”, the updated one should be “Phairuang et al. (2021) [53], reported on the source apportionment of PM_0.1 particles in Bangkok”. In the original article [1], there was a missing reference 92 in Figure 1. A correction has been made to Figure 1 to show the morphology of ambient nanoparticles in Chiang Mai, Thailand, as observed in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis [2]—the newly added reference 92. With this correction, the order of some references has been adjusted accordingly. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original article has been updated.