Abstract
This paper discusses the appropriateness of contractual methods towards dispute avoidance and resolution (DAR) for industrial projects in Saudi Arabia. It focuses on the private industrial sector in the Eastern Province. A survey was conducted using the principles of quota sampling where 93 questionnaires were distributed to 11 owners, 59 contractors and 23 consultants. The survey consisted of 20 statements that measured the parties' attitude and opinion towards contractual methods recommended for dispute avoidance and resolution (DAR) during the construction phase. Respondents indicated their level of agreement on a 5-level scale. The results reflect the appropriateness of these techniques for industrial projects. The five contract administration methods for dispute avoidance and resolution (DAR) covered in this study are: Allocating Fair Contract Risk, Drafting Dispute Clauses, Team Building, Provision of a Neutral Arbitrator, and Binding Arbitration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-49 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | International Journal of Project Management |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2000 |
Keywords
- Contract
- Disputes
- Industrial projects
- Saudi Arabia
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contractual methods for dispute avoidance and resolution (DAR)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver