Comment on ‘discussion on barkhausen and nyquist stability criteria’

Muhammad Taher Abuelma’Atti*, Zainulabideen Jamal Khalifa

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This comment is related to the recently published article entitled ‘‘On ‘Discussion on Barkhausen and Nyquist stability criteria’, Analog Integrated circuits and signal processing, Vol. 70, pp. 443–449, 2012. In this article the authors considered one of the possible four alternatives of the Wien-bridge oscillator that was previously considered in the article entitled ‘‘Discussion on Barkhausen and Nyquist stability criteria’’, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Vol. 62, pp. 327– 332, 2010, which depicts the failure of Barkhausen criterion concerning the determination of the condition of oscillation startup of sinusoidal oscillation. In the above mentioned articles the operational amplifier used is assumed ideal. In this comment it will be shown that the Wien-bridge oscillator circuit used in the above mentioned articles can behave as a sinusoidal oscillator only at relatively high frequencies when the operational amplifier can be considered non-ideal. At relatively low frequencies; when the operational amplifier can be considered ideal, the same circuit behaves as a relaxation oscillator with a square wave output rather than a sinusoidal output.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)989-992
Number of pages4
JournalAnalog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing
Volume73
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2012

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.

Keywords

  • Barkhausen criterion
  • Operational amplifier
  • Relaxation oscillator
  • Sinusoidal oscillator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Signal Processing
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on ‘discussion on barkhausen and nyquist stability criteria’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this