Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Collaboration and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights and Recommendations from a Systematic Review

  • Nadia Zahoor
  • , Omar Al-Tabbaa
  • , Zaheer Khan*
  • , Geoffrey Wood
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

164 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper performs a systematic literature review of the undeniably diverse – and somewhat fragmented – current state of research on the collaborations and internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). We analyze key works and synthesize them into a framework that conceptually maps key antecedents, mediators, and moderators that influence the internationalization of SMEs. In addition, we highlight limitations of the literature, most notably in terms of theoretical fragmentation; extant theories are deployed and illustrated but rarely extended in a manner that significantly informs subsequent work. At an applied (but related) level, we argue the need for supplementary work that explores the distinct stages of internationalization – and the scope and scale of this process – rather than assuming closure around particular events. With this, we highlight the need for more rigorous and empirically informed explorations of contextual effects that take account of the consequences of developments in the global economic ecosystem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-456
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Journal of Management Reviews
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Management Reviews published by British Academy of Management and John Wiley & Sons Ltd

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Decision Sciences
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collaboration and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights and Recommendations from a Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this