Abstract
The principal options for engineering Earths ecological future can be concisely visualized in a conceptual dilemma matrix. Scaling of the matrix with real world data confirms the widening of Earths sustainability gap, due to our increasing ecological footprint. The simplicity of the dilemma matrix articulated here may help to focus the debate at future Global Summits and World Future Energy Summits on the critical scenario options. Geoscientists and engineers at energy companies share a major responsibility with many societal actors in setting the right example, particularly in searching for sustainable energy solutions. One view is that technology can help solve all issues. Another view is that nature is needed for sustainable ecosystem services. A most pessimistic view is based on analogy of human behavior with that of ants - eusocial groups like ourselves. Ant wars for access to limited resources warn us for a future where scarcity of resources may force us to resort to brutal, competitive behavior - rather than civilized diplomacy. Options to avoid such an outcome are outlined in this study.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4667-4672 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Biophiles
- Ecological dilemma matrix
- Ecological footprint
- Ecosystem services
- Scenarios
- Sustainable energy solutions
- Technophiles
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can we close Earths sustainability gap?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver