Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions

Marcello M. Mariani*, Isa Machado, Vittoria Magrelli, Yogesh K. Dwivedi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

355 Scopus citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly adopted by organizations to innovate, and this is ever more reflected in scholarly work. To illustrate, assess and map research at the intersection of AI and innovation, we performed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of published work indexed in the Clarivate Web of Science (WOS) and Elsevier Scopus databases (the final sample includes 1448 articles). A bibliometric analysis was deployed to map the focal field in terms of dominant topics and their evolution over time. By deploying keyword co-occurrences, and bibliographic coupling techniques, we generate insights on the literature at the intersection of AI and innovation research. We leverage the SLR findings to provide an updated synopsis of extant scientific work on the focal research area and to develop an interpretive framework which sheds light on the drivers and outcomes of AI adoption for innovation. We identify economic, technological, and social factors of AI adoption in firms willing to innovate. We also uncover firms' economic, competitive and organizational, and innovation factors as key outcomes of AI deployment. We conclude this paper by developing an agenda for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102623
JournalTechnovation
Volume122
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Bibliometric analysis
  • Innovation
  • Systematic literature review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Engineering
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this