TY - JOUR
T1 - An investigation of thermal and hydrodynamic behaviour of compound fins under turbulent flow conditions
T2 - A numerical and experimental approach
AU - Tariq, Adeel
AU - Ahmed, Syed Waqar
AU - Bin Baharom, Masri
AU - Altaf, Khurram
AU - Hussain, Ghulam
AU - Jamil, Abdullah
AU - Mohammed, Salah E.
AU - Ali, Hafiz Muhammad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - This study analyses Compound Fins (CFs) in turbulent airflows using numerical and experimental methods. CFs combine Novel Plate Fin Heatsinks (NPFHSs) [1] and Slotted fins (S8 and S9) [2] and are compared to plain plate fins. Numerical modelling of turbulent airflow is conducted using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations, and ANSYS is used for the analysis. The CFs are manufactured using selective laser melting and validated experimentally. CF variations are categorized as CF18, CF19, CF28 and CF29 as described in Table 1. CFs outperform plain fins, with CF18, CF19, CF28, and CF29 showing higher Nu numbers by 52.7%, 51.2%, 44.8%, and 47.9%, respectively. CF18 and CF19 have 22.9% and 21.7% higher heat transfer coefficients than NPFHS1, respectively. CF28 and CF29 have 19.1% and 22.4% higher heat transfer coefficients than NPFHS2, respectively. CF18 and CF19 have higher air pressure drops than plain fins, while CF28 and CF29 have lesser pressure loss. The study concludes that CFs perform better than plain fins and are lighter. The methodology ensures the accuracy and reliability of the findings, making the study a valuable contribution to electronic cooling.
AB - This study analyses Compound Fins (CFs) in turbulent airflows using numerical and experimental methods. CFs combine Novel Plate Fin Heatsinks (NPFHSs) [1] and Slotted fins (S8 and S9) [2] and are compared to plain plate fins. Numerical modelling of turbulent airflow is conducted using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations, and ANSYS is used for the analysis. The CFs are manufactured using selective laser melting and validated experimentally. CF variations are categorized as CF18, CF19, CF28 and CF29 as described in Table 1. CFs outperform plain fins, with CF18, CF19, CF28, and CF29 showing higher Nu numbers by 52.7%, 51.2%, 44.8%, and 47.9%, respectively. CF18 and CF19 have 22.9% and 21.7% higher heat transfer coefficients than NPFHS1, respectively. CF28 and CF29 have 19.1% and 22.4% higher heat transfer coefficients than NPFHS2, respectively. CF18 and CF19 have higher air pressure drops than plain fins, while CF28 and CF29 have lesser pressure loss. The study concludes that CFs perform better than plain fins and are lighter. The methodology ensures the accuracy and reliability of the findings, making the study a valuable contribution to electronic cooling.
KW - Compound Fins
KW - Heat Sink
KW - Heat Transfer
KW - Perforations
KW - Pressure-Drop
KW - Slots
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183156385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aej.2024.01.051
DO - 10.1016/j.aej.2024.01.051
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183156385
SN - 1110-0168
VL - 89
SP - 149
EP - 171
JO - Alexandria Engineering Journal
JF - Alexandria Engineering Journal
ER -