Alternative parameterisations for predictive control: How and why?

G. Valencia-Palomo; J. A. Rossiter; C. N. Jones; R. Gondhalekar; B. Khan

doi:10.1109/acc.2011.5990639

Alternative parameterisations for predictive control: How and why?

G. Valencia-Palomo^*
, J. A. Rossiter
, C. N. Jones
, R. Gondhalekar
, B. Khan

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper looks at the efficiency of the parameterisation of the degrees of freedom within an optimal predictive control algorithm. It is shown that the conventional approach of directly determining each individual future control move is not efficient in general, and can give poor feasibility when the number of degrees of freedom are limited. Two systematic alternatives are explored and both shown to be far more efficient in general.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, ACC 2011
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages	5175-5180
Number of pages	6
ISBN (Print)	9781457700804
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/acc.2011.5990639
State	Published - 2011
Externally published	Yes

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of the American Control Conference
ISSN (Print)	0743-1619

Keywords

Laguerre functions
MPC
feasibility volumes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1109/acc.2011.5990639

Cite this

Valencia-Palomo, G., Rossiter, J. A., Jones, C. N., Gondhalekar, R., & Khan, B. (2011). Alternative parameterisations for predictive control: How and why? In Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, ACC 2011 (pp. 5175-5180). Article 5990639 (Proceedings of the American Control Conference). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/acc.2011.5990639

@inproceedings{5ae9b4a4f12640feb782465511a7eb25,

title = "Alternative parameterisations for predictive control: How and why?",

abstract = "This paper looks at the efficiency of the parameterisation of the degrees of freedom within an optimal predictive control algorithm. It is shown that the conventional approach of directly determining each individual future control move is not efficient in general, and can give poor feasibility when the number of degrees of freedom are limited. Two systematic alternatives are explored and both shown to be far more efficient in general.",

keywords = "Laguerre functions, MPC, feasibility volumes",

author = "G. Valencia-Palomo and Rossiter, \{J. A.\} and Jones, \{C. N.\} and R. Gondhalekar and B. Khan",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1109/acc.2011.5990639",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781457700804",

series = "Proceedings of the American Control Conference",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

pages = "5175--5180",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, ACC 2011",

address = "United States",

}

Valencia-Palomo, G, Rossiter, JA, Jones, CN, Gondhalekar, R & Khan, B 2011, Alternative parameterisations for predictive control: How and why? in Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, ACC 2011., 5990639, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 5175-5180. https://doi.org/10.1109/acc.2011.5990639

Alternative parameterisations for predictive control: How and why? / Valencia-Palomo, G.; Rossiter, J. A.; Jones, C. N. et al.
Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, ACC 2011. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2011. p. 5175-5180 5990639 (Proceedings of the American Control Conference).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Alternative parameterisations for predictive control

T2 - How and why?

AU - Valencia-Palomo, G.

AU - Rossiter, J. A.

AU - Jones, C. N.

AU - Gondhalekar, R.

AU - Khan, B.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper looks at the efficiency of the parameterisation of the degrees of freedom within an optimal predictive control algorithm. It is shown that the conventional approach of directly determining each individual future control move is not efficient in general, and can give poor feasibility when the number of degrees of freedom are limited. Two systematic alternatives are explored and both shown to be far more efficient in general.

AB - This paper looks at the efficiency of the parameterisation of the degrees of freedom within an optimal predictive control algorithm. It is shown that the conventional approach of directly determining each individual future control move is not efficient in general, and can give poor feasibility when the number of degrees of freedom are limited. Two systematic alternatives are explored and both shown to be far more efficient in general.

KW - Laguerre functions

KW - MPC

KW - feasibility volumes

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/80053146786

U2 - 10.1109/acc.2011.5990639

DO - 10.1109/acc.2011.5990639

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:80053146786

SN - 9781457700804

T3 - Proceedings of the American Control Conference

SP - 5175

EP - 5180

BT - Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, ACC 2011

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -