Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Accelerating repetitive construction projects: With uncertainty and contractors’ judgment

  • Osama Moselhi
  • , Ibrahim Bakry*
  • , Adel Alshibani
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Project acceleration is a common yet complicated task performed by contractors in construction projects. In repetitive projects, contractors often face having to accelerate their projects using tools that are not suited for repetitive projects and that neglect many factors influencing acceleration plans. This paper presents a new method for schedule acceleration of repetitive construction projects. This method brings two main improvements; it captures uncertainty associated with the acceleration cost and allows accounting for contractors own perspective while creating acceleration plans. Activities are prioritized for acceleration based on cost slope and contractors’ judgment. Fuzzy set theory is utilized to model uncertainties associated with acceleration costs, while contractors’ judgment is utilized to account for other influential factors. The developed method provides contractors with a set of measures and indices to evaluate different generated schedule acceleration plans. A case study was analyzed to demonstrate the method’s capabilities and its suitability for repetitive projects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)949-957
Number of pages9
JournalCanadian journal of civil engineering
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 28 Sep 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Canadian Science Publishing. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Fuzzy set theory
  • Linear scheduling
  • Repetitive projects
  • Schedule acceleration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • General Environmental Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accelerating repetitive construction projects: With uncertainty and contractors’ judgment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this