Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A randomized, double-blind, comparative study of terbinafine vs griseofulvin in tinea capitis

  • Ts Haroon*
  • , I. Hussain
  • , S. Aman
  • , Ah Nagi
  • , I. Ahmad
  • , M. Zahid
  • , Kh Alvi
  • , N. Iqbal
  • , Ka Khan
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

An open clinical pilot study of terbinafine (Lamid® in patients with tinea capitis had suggested that this agent was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with this indication. On this basis, a double-blind randomized study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of terbinafine, given once daily for 4 weeks, and griseofulvin, given once daily for 8 weeks, was initiated. A 4-week placebo wash-out period separated the two active-treatment periods. Although this study is still in progress and the codes have not yet been broken, clinical and laboratory evaluation of 30 patients suggests that short-term (4-week) therapy with terbinafine is as effective and safe as 8 weeks of griseofulvin therapy in patients, including children, with tinea capitis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-27
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Dermatological Treatment
Volume3
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized, double-blind, comparative study of terbinafine vs griseofulvin in tinea capitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this