Abstract
In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis and comparison of state-of-the-art Contrast Enhancement (CE) evaluation metrics. In this work, we developed a new database consisting of 182 images. The subjective experiments were performed to obtain a preference rating from different observers for the enhanced images using six CE methods selected from different representative categories. The quality of the enhanced images is measured with most commonly used CE evaluation metrics. We provide the ranking of images based on perceptual preference as well as objective quality metrics scores. We show that some of the metrics used for the enhancement evaluation are not consistent with the human subjective scores. This new database, named as Contrast Enhancement Evaluation Database (CEED2016), is made publicly available to the research community at http://wwwl2ti. univ-paris13.fr/site/index.php/en/CEED2016/ and is expected to be a contribution to the area of Image Quality Assessment (IQA) and particularly for image quality enhancement evaluation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 2016 6th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing, EUVIP 2016 |
Editors | L. Oudre, A. Beghdadi, S. Bourennane, A. Bouzerdoum, M. Pedersen, R. Jiang |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781509027811 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Dec 2016 |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings of the 2016 6th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing, EUVIP 2016 |
---|
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 IEEE.
Keywords
- contrast enhancement database
- contrast enhancement evaluation metrics
- image enhancement
- image quality assessment
- subjective experiments
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Information Systems
- Signal Processing