A comparison of variations in blocking mechanisms of membrane-fouling models for estimating flux during water treatment

  • Imtiaz Afzal Khan
  • , Yong Soo Lee
  • , Jong Oh Kim*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study investigates five different fouling models and contributing factors in membrane-filtration blocking mechanisms in a constant-pressure mode. A polyvinylidene fluoride membrane was used to study the fouling effects of a complex mixture of foulants (a latex-bed suspension, soybean oil, and inorganics) on pristine and chemically cleaned membranes in the presence of humic acid. A significance ratio in linear regression results (p-value) was used to assess the contribution of fouling mechanism in each model. The results indicate that Hermia and Bowen's models correspond closely with the experiment results and confirms that complete blocking is dominant fouling model. We also verify that each developed model is dependent on its experimental conditions. Moreover, the role of complex mixtures, including inorganic foulants, in the fouling process needs to be modified as modified for ceramic membranes and natural organic matter removal in the Wiesner and Kilduff models, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Article number127328
JournalChemosphere
Volume259
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Blocking mechanism
  • Dead-end filtration
  • Fouling models
  • Membrane process
  • Participation equation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • General Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of variations in blocking mechanisms of membrane-fouling models for estimating flux during water treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this