Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparative study on the effect of glazing and cooling for compound parabolic concentrator PV systems – Experimental and analytical investigations

  • Haitham M. Bahaidarah*
  • , P. Gandhidasan
  • , Ahmer A.B. Baloch
  • , Bilal Tanweer
  • , M. Mahmood
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

A key barrier to achieving the economic viability and widespread adoption of photovoltaic (PV) technology for the direct conversion of solar radiation to electricity is the losses related to the high operating temperatures of typical flat-type PV modules. This technical and economic study addresses the cost reduction of PV systems by proposing a methodology for the improvement of solar cell efficiency using low-concentration PV technology and compound parabolic concentrators (CPCs). A theoretical model was developed to evaluate the performance of PV-CPC systems considering their optical, thermal and electrical properties. The model was implemented to investigate glazed and unglazed PV-CPC systems with and without active cooling and it was validated against experimental data. A laboratory-scale bench-top PV string was designed and built with symmetrically truncated CPC modules in these four configurations. The constructed glazed and unglazed PV-CPC systems were used for measurements at the geographic location of Dhahran and showed a very good agreement of 3.8–6.5% between the calculated and experimental results. The effect of glazing was studied and from the electrical point of view, glazing was found to reduce the power output. From the thermal point of view, glazing increased the thermal gain of the PV-CPC system. An unglazed PV-CPC system is recommended for greater electric power output, and glazed system is recommended for higher thermal gain. For economic feasibility, levelized cost of energy (LCE) analysis was performed using annual power output simulations and cost parameters incurred in the installation and operations phase of four systems considered. Annual power output was found to increase by 53.45% for unglazed CPC and 37.1% for glazed CPC systems. The minimum LCE of 0.84 (€/kW h) was found for unglazed CPC with cooling whereas the maximum LCE of 1.67(€/kW h) was obtained for glazed uncooled system due to high cell temperatures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-239
Number of pages13
JournalEnergy Conversion and Management
Volume129
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

  • Experiment
  • Glazed/unglazed PV-CPC system
  • Levelized cost of energy
  • Thermal modeling
  • Water cooling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study on the effect of glazing and cooling for compound parabolic concentrator PV systems – Experimental and analytical investigations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this