Abstract
We study the impact of government expropriation risk on the terms of cross-border syndicated loans. By comparing loans by foreign lenders from countries covered by Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) to loans from non-covered countries, we isolate and quantify the impact of strengthening property rights against government expropriation on loans. We find that stronger property rights lead to a lower cost of debt, larger loans, larger syndicates, less collateral, and fewer covenants. Results are stronger in countries with a history of government expropriations and robust to methodologies accounting for the endogenous nature of BITs and for the simultaneous determination of loan terms. Our findings persist after the inclusion of other metrics of institutional quality, such as legal origin identifiers and an index of creditor rights.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 138-155 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Banking and Finance |
| Volume | 102 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019
Keywords
- Government expropriation
- Political risk
- Property rights
- Syndicated loans
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A BIT of investor protection: How Bilateral Investment Treaties impact the terms of syndicated loans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver